Welcome to All-Medications!

Informing of consumers on medicines still for a long time will be insufficient because the state decides, that is correct, and that is not present in medicinal choice. Actually, it was more useful, taking into account the big stream of the information to liberalize the attitude to medicines, having concentrated attention on side effects, having caused discussion about harm and advantage. one approach - to inform, opposite - to forbid, lower availability of medicines.

There is a psychological barrier in comprehension of that the information not harmful, and it is useful. But so far as in the world the question on the right on Eutonasy is widely discussed, it is logical to assume, that long before the positive decision of this question to patients can be given more trust in a choice of treatment.

Free interpretation of the list no prescription medicines at chemist's sales it is perceived without special vigilances and considers, that in such circumstances it is necessary to give complete data on medicines only. Taking into account the global tendency to the free reference of medicines, it is possible to ascertain: The Internet has outstripped the world, having given patients to choose medicines in a show-window of a drugstore and having made consultation at the pharmacist or the pharmaceutist it is more preferable than visit to to the doctor. It is necessary to make only a selftreatment responsible.